Wow!
With a title like that, you know I've got to have lost my fucking mind, right?
Nah. Not today.
Barack Obama is the single biggest threat we've got in this country and if you don't believe me, just hold on for the ride.
What constitutes a threat to this country? Someone or something that could do great damage to the country, right?
Before you Obama cultists out there get your underwear all knotted up, Hillary Clinton is a threat, too. The difference between her and Obama is that the Obama cultists are drinking the Kool-Aid, actually believing that he's going to do something for them, that he's "uniting" the country.
I think these people should seek professional help. They've been brainwashed by the culture and by the media that perpetuates that culture.
You'd never catch me voting for Hillary Clinton. You'd also never catch me voting for Barack Obama.
Understand something about Barack Obama. Virtually everything you've heard him say and everything you've heard someone say about him is either a lie or a complete twist of history as we should know it.
Today, Ted Kennedy, in endorsing the Illinois senator, said that Barack Obama opposed the Iraq war.
This is a complete twist of history.
Allow me to explain if you need it.
Barack Obama could not have opposed the war in Iraq, at least not on record, because Barack Obama never had to vote for the damn thing in the first place. Ted Kennedy's a great liar, isn't he?
What Teddy Boy didn't tell you or me or anyone else for that matter is that his friend, his new coattail pal, has voted on numerous occasions to fund and thus extend the war in Iraq.
Barack Obama's history gets just a bit murkier, doesn't it?
Further, Obama has never once said that he intends to end the war. I haven't even heard this at one of his numerous rallies with all of the Kool-Aid drinkers waving their signs and their banners and their flags.
He has no plan to end this massacre and guess what, ladies and gentlemen? You're going to be sending your children to this massacre under President Barack Obama just as surely as people have sent their children to the meat grinder under Bush.
And that leads me to my next point.
Barack Obama knows nothing of history.
And this is truly sad for a guy that has degrees and a college education and is revered as being very well learned.
A couple weeks back, he had an interview with the Reno Gazette, in which he said, "Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundementally different path because the country was ready for it."
Well, leaving aside the fact that Reagan was a scumbag and should have never been president (but again, like with Obama himself, the people of this country drank the Kool-Aid and fell for the actor who lied to their faces), let's take that statement apart.
Let's start with Bill Clinton.
Far be it from me to be a fan of Bill Clinton. I consider the man to be an unindicted war criminal, as I consider every president of the United States to have been. If I had my way, Bill Clinton would be in prison, wiling away his days, scratching hash marks against his prison wall. So would Old Man Bush, Dumbfuck Bush, Reagan's bones, Jimmy Carter, and so on all the way back to Washington. Dig 'em up, toss them in a cell and let's get on with telling the truth.
But I digress...
The statement about Bill Clinton was made to provoke a reaction. Obama's learning politics fast.
The comment about Nixon, however, proves Mr. Obama's ignorance of history. And he can almost be excused for it, because Barack Obama was six years-old when Nixon became president for the first time, ten when he became president the second and twelve when Nixon flew away in disgrace.
The thing is, I can't excuse him for it because he's speaking as if he's some kind of authority on the subject. And because he wants to be president.
Anything Barack Obama knows about Richard Nixon, he knows from history books. Thus, I feel as qualified to talk about Nixon as Obama does. But, unlike Obama, I don't presume myself to be an expert on these things and thus I don't pass judgment as arbitrarily as he does.
However, because I'm just an asshole, I do want to talk about what appears to be Obama's hero worship of Reagan.
Obama says, "[Reagan] put us on a fundementally different path because the country was ready for it."
And that fundementally different path had sign posts like Iran-Contra and union-busting and arming Saddam Hussein on it.
And the Kool-Aid continued to flow as a spokesgeek for Obama came out and said, "But Hillary Clinton liked Reagan, too." Not an actual quote but it might as well have been. His actual quote ended with this:
"It's hard to take Hillary Clinton's latest attack seriously when she's the one who supported George Bush's war in Iraq, the most damaging Republican idea of our generation."
That spokesgeek's name is Bill Burton and Burton shows his ignorance by, of course, leaving out the fact that the Democratic Congress, Barack Obama included, has voted to continue this war, which, by the way, started not in 2003 but in 1991 and continued right up through Bill Clinton's eight years (just one of the reasons Bill Clinton should be in jail) and right on through the eight years of Bush.
Is it just me or is everyone in the Obama camp ignorant of everything?
I quote now from
a piece by one of the few decent journalists on the planet, John Pilger, as he wrote in June of last year:
"In the meantime, Iran is being softened up, with the liberal media playing almost the same role it did before the Iraq invasion. And, as for the Democrats, look at how Barack Obama has become the voice of the Council On Foreign Relations, one of the propaganda organs of the old liberal Washington establishment. Obama writes that while he wants the troops home, 'We must not rule out military force against long-standing adversaries such as Iran and Syria.' Listen to this from the liberal Obama: 'At moments of great peril in the past century, our leaders ensured that America, by deed and by example, led and lifted the world, that we stood and fought for the freedom sought by billions of people beyond their borders."
Pilger writes earlier of the absurdity that is/was John Wayne.
I want you to re-read Obama's final comments in the paragraph above and tell me that it doesn't sound like John Wayne should be reading them.
If there's one thing I can't brook, it's bullshit like the statement as made by Obama as read by John Wayne.
Moments of great peril? In the last 100 years, what moments of great peril?
Leaders leading by deed and example? Whom?
Lifting the world? Yeah, to see if they can find oil under there.
And standing and fighting for freedom for billions in other countries? Name one of these countries that didn't have people already inside fighting for their own freedoms. In many cases, when the US decided to get "involved", it destroyed the movement. In many cases, the US then declared these movements to be outlaws, rebels, terrorists.
Again, Barack Obama proves his ignorance towards history. And the Kool-Aid continues to flow.
And this is why he's the biggest threat we've got. Because he can sit there and smile and talk about how he's going to bring change and how he's good for America and how he's a uniter and not a divider (where have I heard that one before?) and, meanwhile, he's got no substance, no plans and no sembalance of difference from the current puppet that sits in the Oval Office playing video games.
I've stated already that I wouldn't be voting for Hillary Clinton so for those out there that think this is a hit piece on Obama for the purposes of making her look oh-so-much-better, please read slower.
For those that plan on voting for Obama, I'd dearly love to hear from you. Tell me why you think Barack Obama is the man to lead this country and why you think that he's not going to be beholden to the puppetmasters behind the throne. And please don't mention the names Hillary or Bill Clinton in your explanation.
Labels: Politics